Search for: "State v. Square" Results 2761 - 2780 of 6,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
In the possession claim, Croydon had served a reply to defence stating that it did not rely upon forfeiture as a ground of possession. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:25 am
Interstate 10 cuts east from El Paso through rocky desert terrain and then morphs into two major interstate highways which meet at a V east of Van Horn. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Related posts: Entire Market Value Rule Lives As $357 Million Verdict DiesThe appeal in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 12:51 pm
In keeping with the spirit of one case on the docket, FCC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Pastides] “Sokal Squared” hoax runs into IRB (human subjects review) issues at Portland State, and it’s more complicated than you might think [Jesse Singal, New York] “A Liberal Case for DeVos’s Reforms” [Lara Bazelon, New York Times] After initial resistance, ACLU moving to acknowledge merit of some objections to Obama-era Title IX procedure [Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic] Attorneys general from 18 states plus D.C. sign letter… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:35 pm by Bruce Nye
    Anyway, back to the article, this is full of all kinds of distributions and trends and means and medians and ratios and regressions and p-values and chi-squared tests and other barnburners like that, all intended to show that in cases where the punitive award is $100 million or more, jury awards -- not just judgments -- are trending downward since SCOTUS's State Farm v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:47 pm by Walter Olson
At the time, some national commentators did not seem to have checked out the actual reasoning of Judge Milton Tingling’s decision, which rested squarely on a distinctive 1987 New York precedent called Boreali v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 7:38 am
The Conspirator in Chief at Volokh raises a fascinating conundrum from the Magistrate Judge's denial of bond in  U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
As stated above, a non exhaustive definition does not necessarily oust other definitions. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by John W. Arden
“That position is somewhat difficult to square with [the dealer’s] well-supported legal argument that the two documents ‘are, in the eyes of the law, one legal instrument. [read post]