Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 16,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2021, 4:15 pm
The case at issue, Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm
“The rule of the strong, not the rule of law”: Reexamining implicit divestiture after McGirt v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:08 pm
"The rule of the strong, not the rule of law": Reexamining implicit divestiture after McGirt v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 9:01 pm
The justices’ decision to hear it sends a strong signal that they intend either to eliminate or substantially curtail the constitutional right to abortion recognized nearly half a century ago in Roe. v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:11 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 9:38 pm
From Friday's Texas Supreme Court decision in Landry's v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
The statement highlights the strong overlap between promoting and protecting competition in digital markets and safeguarding people’s data. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That missionary role is especially evident in the context of European relations with states at the initial phases of development and with Marxist Leninist States. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:25 pm
State v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Newsday Inc. v Long Island Typographical Union No. 915, CWA, AFL-CIO, 915 F2d at 844-845, the Appellate Division noted that the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that an arbitral award was properly vacated under the public policy exception where an arbitrator reinstated a terminated employee who had engaged in multiple acts of sexual harassment. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Newsday Inc. v Long Island Typographical Union No. 915, CWA, AFL-CIO, 915 F2d at 844-845, the Appellate Division noted that the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, held that an arbitral award was properly vacated under the public policy exception where an arbitrator reinstated a terminated employee who had engaged in multiple acts of sexual harassment. [read post]
21 May 2021, 2:47 am
In its judgment in Amaghlobeli and Others v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:46 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:31 pm
During the drive, Sergeant Ade testified that he continued to "smell the . . . strong odor of an alcoholic beverage" and noted that defendant was making "incoherent statements. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
In Bishop v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:00 pm
I see a strong parallel with the third relevant case: NYS Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
