Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
This sets up the business to claim that a subsequent consumer review constitutes trade secret misappropriation. [read post]
8 May 2014, 3:45 am
This came up when the IPKat was searching for anillustration of Panrico's DOGHNUTS: does anyonehave a current DOGHNUTS piccie for us ...? [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:40 pm by Christine Nielsen Czuprynski
There has also been an recent up-surge of VPPA cases alleging that various news and entertainment organizations violated the VPPA by sharing what consumers watched with third-party analytics companies. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., we explained: ‘… Speech likewise is protected even though it is carried in a form that is ‘sold’ for profit [citing, among others, a case involving sales of allegedly pornographic books]…. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiffs sued, alleging California, New Jersey, and New York consumer protection claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm by HS_admin
   Both sides of this issue continue to gear up for a long awaited debate on the issues relating to condominiums, construction defects and the need to protect both the builder as well as the homeowner. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:56 am by admin
As in consumers can’t understand that different prices are the result of competition? [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:26 am by Kevin
Privacy isn’t just about regulatory compliance. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The point of allowing “Walmart law” is to allow greater consumer choice. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:15 am by Ron Coleman
Dec. 4, 2013) that declared the existential impossibility of a claim for contributory liability based on the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
”  Another first-time relist is T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]