Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 2761 - 2780 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2018, 4:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
  See AIA Section 18 (because they it is a temporary program, the CBM provisions have not been codified in the United States Code). [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:54 pm by Jon Katz
Whenever a non-United States citizen is charged with a crime, it is important for that criminal defendant’s lawyer to address with the client the risks that a conviction might pose for adjustment of immigration status and applications for other immigration relief, possible deportation, and possible exclusion from the United States. [read post]
26 May 2018, 1:52 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In April 2012, Kang and the twins relocated to the United States while Ogawa remained in Japan. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am by Aurora Barnes
Garza 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
Petitioners commenced this combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action to challenge Local Law No. 3, arguing that it was adopted in violation of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); was not consistent with the comprehensive plan; and constituted illegal spot zoning. [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
  United States Patent Nos. 7,912,786 (“the ‘786 patent”), 8,131,643 (“the ‘643 patent”), 8,321,347 (“the ‘643 patent”), and 8,620,809 (“the ‘809 patent”). [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:47 pm by JP Sarmiento
Our client has a dentistry degree in Egypt which is evaluated as an equivalent degree of Doctor of Dental Medicine degree the United States. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:44 am
"Section 2(d) “does not speak of ‘continuous use,’ but rather of whether the mark or trade name has been ‘previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:25 pm by JP Sarmiento
 Our client has a master’s degree in divinity in the United States and currently works for the church with R-1 visa. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5684 Issues: (1) Whether the petitioner’s mandatory guidelines sentence, which was enhanced under the residual clause of U.S.S.G. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
The petitioner in Virginia Uranium Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:48 pm by JP Sarmiento
With the approved Immigrant visa, our client’s step-son can come to the United States immediately, and he will get his green card. [read post]