Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 8,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
By Russell Smith President Obama hasn’t hesitated to silence critics of his military policy. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Smith and Desmond King, America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect versus Repair (University of Chicago Press, 2024).Alexandra Filindra In America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm
Perhaps yes, inasmuch as both of us identify in profound ways as "Americans" and not really as a deracinated "citizen of the world," with equal "concern and respect" for anyone and everyone living anywhere and everywhere. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:45 pm
See Christian v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:05 pm
Smith (traveling alone), with United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 3:20 pm
SmithUnited States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
This summary will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:19 pm
See, e.g., Beasley v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The celebration of two decades of the House of Lords patent biopatent ruling in Biogen v Medeva, hosted by Rouse, is happily recorded on PatLit by Rouseniks Mary Smillie and Catriona Smith. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
The CJEU case of Generics BV v Smith Kline & French [1997] RPC 801 is also often cited. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
* Can you use short musical sequences as background loop for a rap song? [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
Smith [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that neither educator could avail herself of the hearing procedures set out in Education Law §3020-a.Further, while a counseling letter is “active” in a personnel file, the district may subsequently initiate disciplinary action based on the same event and the memorandum itself could be introduced as evidence in the course of the disciplinary proceeding.On this point, as the Court of Appeal ruled in Patterson v Smith, 53… [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:00 pm
Smith, 738 F.2d 1249, 1276 (D.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 5:12 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
