Search for: "United States Solicitor General" Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2013, 9:20 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  On May 17, the Solicitor General, having been invited to do so by the court, filed a brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the court should grant the petition for certiorari. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am by Miriam Seifter
 All agree, the Court says, that under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:00 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
KaplinskyLast week, the Solicitor General finally filed his brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm by Amy Howe
  Instead, they issue an order “invit[ing] the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States” – also known as a “CVSG,” for “call for the views of the Solicitor General. [read post]
16 May 2013, 11:54 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Sony Computer v. 1st Media LLC, Docket No 12-1086 (on petition for writ of certiorari 2013) In a recent order, the Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General to file a brief in this expressing the views of the United States in this pending inequitable conduct case. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:01 am by Dan Ernst
Before being appointed to the Supreme Court by President Lyndon Johnson, Marshall was a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Federal Judge (1961-1965), and Solicitor General of the United States (1965-1966). [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
United States, 12-6558, in which the Court had called for a response from the Solicitor General. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal reports on a recent reception in honor of Solicitor General Don Verrilli. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
The Justices interviewed also all said that Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart’s concession that certain books could be banned had nothing to do with the decision to reargue the case. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am by Benjamin Wittes
And in that book (see page 69), he conspicuously omits command of the military from his list of preclusive presidential foreign affairs powers: [O]ur National Security Constitution rests upon a simple notion: that generally speaking, the foreign affairs power of the United States is a power shared among the three branches of the national government. . . . [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:04 am by Keith R. Fisher
Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1012-1013 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 (1986), and United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
Beck notes that the Solicitor General “has filed the expected petition for certiorari” seeking review of the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:01 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
After Chris argued, the Solicitor General, Donald Verrilli, argued for 10 minutes on behalf of the government. [read post]