Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 2761 - 2780 of 3,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm by Michael O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:18 am by Adam Schlossman
United States (09-6822) – In a 6-2 opinion by Justice Sotomayor (with Justice Kagan recused), the Court vacates in part, affirms in part, and remands the case to the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:13 am by Ronald Mann
Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States in support of Stanford. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by Lisa McElroy
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front:  United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
Needless to say, any time the United States Supreme Supreme Court issues a case involving preemption, we here at Abnormal Use pay close attention. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
 http://katzjustice.com Today, the United States Supreme Court substantially retreated from Crawford v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am by brettb
The state appeals court affirmed, relying on Geier v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:43 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
The decision was appealed, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am by Orin Kerr
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which a divided Court held (for the second time) that federal regulations promulgated by the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
While a detailed doctrinal analysis to support this assertion would be more appropriate for another venue, a careful review of the Court's severability reasoning in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Ronald Mann
Robbins (1997), in which the Court deferred to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation, or was prohibited by the intervening decision in United States v Mead Corporation (2001). [read post]