Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm
It does seem to me, however, that what's really happening here is an attempt to re-write First Amendment jurisprudence to more closely resemble what goes on in the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:43 pm
Today, the Sixth Circuit affirmed on all grounds in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:53 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
Donati v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:12 pm
In National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:19 pm
In Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am
I was one of many who traveled (in my case, on foot) to the United States Supreme Court on April 22, 2019 to watch oral arguments in the case of Food Marketing Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Circuit’s decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
James Pohl, the presiding judge in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 11:59 pm
The Ninth recites the new Supreme Court standard for this too-frequent situation, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:08 pm
United States? [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 9:17 am
One of the most powerful yet unremarked-upon drivers of our current wars over definitions of gender is a concerted push by members of one of the richest families in the United States to transition Americans from a dimorphic definition of sex to the broad acceptance and propagation of synthetic sex identities (SSI). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
Massachusetts drug and gun charges often involve hearing to suppress evidence based on a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012). [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
” It’s the law of the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:17 pm
This practice effectively ended when the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) held that such functionally limited claims did not meet the “written description” requirement of 35 USC 112 (Amgen v. [read post]
