Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 21,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Baker or Reno v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:31 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the Federal law banning partial-birth (i.e., late term) abortions. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
Rather, United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:53 pm
In Nodal v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:48 am
The KSC affirmed in State v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:03 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:34 pm
" In this decision, the United States Supreme Court said "no. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:01 am
State of Louisiana, 379 U.S.64 (1964); State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am
For over 40 years, Amzi Takiedine had been a 7-Eleven franchisee when he sued his franchisor in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
United States, 459 F.2d 631, 635 (9th Cir. 1972); see also, Black v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In Carrasco v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
The tone of Hawkins’ argument was set three sentences into his presentation, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted to ask pointedly: “Is it not the case that no other political entity would be immune from such a quiet-title suit, not the United States, not a state of the United States, not a foreign government? [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
The opinion is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]