Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 7:43 am
United States leaves me puzzled. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
The statutory analysis begins with 17 U.S.C. sec. 602(a)(1): Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:33 am
§ 1182(h) (2006), only if the conviction occurred after the alien was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident following inspection at a port of entry. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., ACands, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:54 pm
Holder. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
State Election Commission [AIR 1997 P&H 164], in which the High Court was considering a similar question as to whether the Election Tribunal constituted under the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, had the power to pass an injunction so as to restrain an elected representative from assuming office pending adjudication of an election petition filed against him. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:15 am
So if you buy 1000 copies of a copyright-protected work in Singapore and attempt to bring them into the United States, even if those copies are being sold with the authority of the copyright holder, you need an additional authorization from the copyright holder for the importation; without that authorization, you will be violating the copyright holder’s exclusive right to distribute copies of the work. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:03 am
She was treated free of charge at United States Army hospitals by virtue of her husband's military status. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:09 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:55 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether its ruling in Padilla v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:26 am
In the suit, PNY Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 5:42 pm
In effect what they receive is a second chance to remain in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:09 am
” Citing the United States Supreme Court’s landmark holding in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:55 pm
United States. [read post]
