Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Precedential No. 18 (Part I): Fraud! TTAB Grants Petition to Cancel BLOOKE Registration for Bicycles
12 Aug 2024, 3:37 am
Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
(H.K.) v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
The Fashionista blog predicts that this is unlikely to be the end of the story, with a further appeal here and/or further proceedings in the United States unless the parties can use yesterday’s judgment to form the basis of a coexistence agreement. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
In Matal v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 5:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
This new tax was challenged in court and the Supreme Court, in Pollock v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:48 am
It has continuously and substantially exclusively used the CITY OF LONDON mark in the United States since 2012, with sales from October 2012 through November 22, 2019 (date of the declaration) exceeding $1.5 million dollars. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read blog]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read blog]
18 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
Siegal’s diet and certain of his intellectual property throughout the United States and Canada in exchange for a fee and royalties. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Unite Here * Trademark Dilution Symposium Videos * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
From there, we turned to the rise of the right of publicity in the United States, A Right is Born: Celebrity, Property and Postmodern Lawmaking, by Mark Bartholomew, who explored a fascinating tension regarding the growth of the right of publicity both before and after the 1980s. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided on Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
That case, Matal v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:15 pm
On January 3, 2020, Axon Enterprises Inc. filed a complaint against the Federal Trade Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona challenging the constitutionality of the FTC’s administrative process. [read post]
