Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 2761 - 2780 of 4,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
  Men who had helped save the Union while in the ranks of the United States Colored Troops, were to be defenseless against their former enemies previously clad in Confederate Gray, now wearing the robes of the Ku Klux Klan. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:10 pm by Gene Quinn
Who knows what goes through the minds of anyone, let alone a cloistered Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:38 pm by Clarence T.
Chicago, the United States Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms now applies against state and local governments, in addition to the federal government. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE #3: I should perhaps have pointed out that there is considerable academic controversy about the validity of criminologist Gary Kleck’s estimate, linked above, that there are 2.5 million defensive uses of guns per year in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:45 pm
  Justices Stevens, Breyer, Ginsburg, and Sotamayor decried the Court’s majority ruling as unnecessary and indeed “fantastic” (but not in a good way). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Justice Stevens wants to revive, he says, Justice Cardozo's test from Palko v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
United States, 444 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm by David S. Cohen
  Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Billions, potentially trillions, of dollars of revenue are dependent on the patent laws of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:49 am
The US Supreme Court finally issued it's long-awaited decision in decision in Bilski v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:46 am by Meg Martin
StateCitation: 2010 WY 88Docket Number: S-09-0112Appeal from the District Court of Park County, the Honorable Steven Cranfill, Judge.Representing Bloomer: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:28 am by Gene Quinn
The Applicants then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by William S. Dodge
” And Justice Stevens adopted an effects view of the presumption as far back as his 1992 concurrence in Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm by Tom Goldstein
The next case is McDonald v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 12:50 pm by Erin Miller
United States (because we do not regard them as having been decided on the merits) and Citizens United (an OT08 case).) [read post]