Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2014, 6:07 pm
I don’t know what these two defendants are doing for counsel. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
I don't see that. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
I don't want them to feel intimidated in any way…. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am
But then we get the oddity that in principle a very weak precedent can be strengthened by repeated reconsideration and reaffirmation.I don't have a good theoretical solution to what strikes me as a genuine puzzle. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:34 am
I don't think it is. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:02 am
Advice from a judge: what you wear to court matters, and if you're accused of drunk driving, don't wear a tee shirt with a beer logo. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:44 pm
(Spoiler Alert: I don't give away anything below that would undermine the pleasure of the book, but those who like to know next to nothing of a book's plot before reading it should probably stop here.)The book begins with a President attempting to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am
That's it: No legal analysis, no explanation of why the First Amendment and common-law rights of access don't apply, why they're trumped by some overriding interest, or anything else. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
There's no mention of how 14 year old brains don't process things the same way as adults. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Judges don't expose probationers to death to make a point and curry public favor.And what is probation to do with this? [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:16 am
But the fact is, when someone carries out a brutal act right in front of you, even if it is against someone you love, you simply don't know what you'll do unless you're in that situation. [read post]
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
It's the stuff that is in the inside of an eyewitness's mind that jurors don't understand. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 3:08 am
I don't know why. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:57 am
Its those general concepts that most people don't know and give the best benefit. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:54 am
We don't have balance any more. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:19 pm
"A lot of defendants don't trust their public defenders," he says. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:47 pm
He’d referred to another media controversy in which a police officer was facing DUI charges and telling a prosecutor that “we’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t,” the judge wrote.The judge added that the “police conduct in this case which led to the arrest of the defendant is exactly the type of conduct which the exclusionary rule is meant to deter. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:17 am
, and is more likely to be a defamation defendant than plaintiff–though he is defamation-resistant because, according to one judge, no one actually believes what he says. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
I don't think legal rules can meaningfully keep digital content from leaking out of easily breached digital containers. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:13 am
(Editors' Note: As loyal readers know, we don't always agree with the decisions of our Article III judges, and we don't mind saying so. [read post]
