Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 3,647
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
By a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth (hey, some things are maybe predictable) Circuit, the Honorable William A. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:23 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:49 am
Also on Monday, the Court will hear arguments in Pepper v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm
The case was Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm
Several Northern District of California judges have recently released orders in civil rights cases and petitions for habeas corpus, among them: In Bolbol v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
William Bounds, Ltd (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking plaintiff must meet rule 9(b) pleading for intent: Simonian v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
District Judge William Zloch. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:55 pm
” William Wiley v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
WILLIAM IREY. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
District Court, Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:56 pm
Cases against developers and plumbing contractors continued until final settlements were reached in November 2009 when District Court Judge Timothy Williams approved a partial settlement of $90 million dollars. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, and the most current example of its departure from established precedent is Boyd v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 10:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
In a 2-1 opinion released last week, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court on both issues. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
A select few students in border districts go to schools across state lines. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
The SCOTUSBlog notes that “[i]n a a summary decision, without noted dissent, the Court reminded lower federal courts that they may not rule in favor of a state prisoner’s habeas challenge unless they explicitly find a violation of federal law — either the Constitution or a federal statute. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:15 pm
” Related Web Resources: Poptech LP v. [read post]
