Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 2761 - 2780
of 61,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Court also agreed with the statute of limitations argument, stating In this case, the project concluded Jan. 31, 2019, when the work on the prime contract was completed. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Therefore, it expired on February 3, 2009, long before the plaintiffs brought the action in New York state court in December 2022. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
In the State of Utah v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:14 pm
Among the many states where I have worked on cases, Flori-duh is the worst. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
In Hubbert v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
(quoting Marchant v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
”* Port Authority Police Officers are members of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
The post Cruz v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:09 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm
Southwest Cheese Company (10th Cir., June 18, 2015) (affirming exclusion of portions of affidavits and summary judgement in connection with hostile work environment, constructive discharge, and remand of state law claims)Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Accidental disability retirement benefits are available to an applicant if the precipitating event is not a risk of the work ordinarily performed by the applicantLarivey v DiNapoli, 2019 NY Slip Op 00018, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBecky C. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Accidental disability retirement benefits are available to an applicant if the precipitating event is not a risk of the work ordinarily performed by the applicantLarivey v DiNapoli, 2019 NY Slip Op 00018, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBecky C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am
In R v Gul [2013] UKSC 64, an appeal concerning other aspects of the anti-terrorism regime, the Court stated that “detention of the kind provided for in the Schedule represents the possibility of serious invasions of personal liberty”: [64]. [read post]
12 May 2012, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:17 am
Dent v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 8:09 am
Ruling came down in Chauvin v. [read post]
