Search for: "v. JONES" Results 2761 - 2780 of 9,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2016, 8:28 am by Kirk Jenkins
This morning, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Jones v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am by Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
This was the question put squarely to the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Mackie 2014 ABCA 221. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:47 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: In the Supreme Court's recent decision on GPS monitoring, United States v.... [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
One half of your dynamic blogging duo -- Herrmann, of Jones Day -- will argue Ackermann in the Fifth Circuit, where the learned intermediary doctrine is the primary ground for affirming a trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of a drug manufacturer, but implied conflict preemption and fraud-on-the-FDA preemption (in the context of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code) are alternative grounds for affirmance.On Tuesday, December 4, Ted Olson of Gibson, Dunn &… [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 7:40 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: Dina El Boghdady of The Washington Post discusses Gabelli v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:20 am by Franita Tolson
  I suspect that Justice O’Connor’s decision to cloak this deference in the rubric of strict scrutiny has laid the groundwork for a Brown v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:13 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The amicus brief in support of DOJ’s cert petition in Jones is here. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:43 pm by James Beard
The decision is one of the first Circuit Court decisions to address punitive damages availability in a Jones Act or unseaworthiness action since the Supreme Court of the United States’ land mark decision in Atlantic Soundings v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]