Search for: "*house v. U. S"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2017, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court case, Burwell v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
Kankanton v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:38 pm
In Texas Dep’t of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:18 am
In its 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:06 am
New York City Housing Authority, 236 A. 2d 170 (1st Dept. 1997)). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am
Toth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
The Associated Press also has coverage of today’s decision in Maracich v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:46 am
Robinson v Day 2019 NY Slip Op 30153(U) January 16, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 600907/2010 Judge: O. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
It’s the first Monday in October, which means the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
In Merrill v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
U. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg cited language from the court’s 2010 decision in Magwood v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
The decision in Krigsman v Goldberg 2018 NY Slip Op 30104(U) January 19, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151271 /16 Judge: Manuel J. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Calvao v. [read post]
Grieving Parents (Still) Can’t Sue Topix For Son’s Oxy Overdose–Witkoff v. Topix (Forbes Cross-Post)
24 Sep 2015, 10:01 am
U-Haul; cf. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
In blogging a few days ago about prosecutors and “Brick-throwing from glass houses,” I’d mentioned that the decision in Thompson v Connick was still pending. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:47 am
Judges Răduleţu and Guerra Martins partly dissented, in particular being of the view that the Article 6 complaint should have been declared admissible. [read post]
