Search for: "*long v. Murphy" Results 261 - 280 of 685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 pm
Murphy decision, with the amendment of RSSL § 607-b [L.2004, c. 725, § 1, eff. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
"On Additional Hour of Pay" under California Labor Code Section 226.7 Constitutes Wage or Premium Pay Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations Period, not a Penalty Subject to One-Year Limitations Period, California Supreme Court Holds In a case that will have a substantial and immediate impact on labor law class action cases, the California Supreme Court today issued its long-awaited decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:52 am
The answer is "Yes", New York Courts long ago considered these issues. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
Murphy’s a one-trick pony, having ridden the Sandy Hook shootings all the way from obscurity to the U.S. [read post]
Another Year, Another Attempt in Congress to Ban Non-Competes Nationwide Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) introduced legislation in 2019 entitled the Workforce Mobility Act (“WMA”). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., Inc., 188 AD3d 624, 626 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 270; MAAD Constr., Inc. v Cavallino Risk Mgt., Inc., 178 AD3d 816, 818). [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
Long Island Railroad Co. , 248 N.Y. 339 (N.Y. 1928) The Peevyhouses from Peevyhouse v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:18 am by B.W. Barnett
”To bolster its conclusion that questions 2-4 were unconstitutional, Justice Livingston's opinion cited the Supreme Court case of Minnesota v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:09 pm by Elim
Long, The Science Behind the Art of Legal Writing (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2015). [read post]