Search for: "A & B Extreme, Inc" Results 261 - 280 of 1,205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Atovaquone Oral Suspension, USP 750 mg/5mL, has been recalled by KVK Tech, Inc. due to defects resulting from exposure to extreme temperatures during shipping. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Such an approach will likely conclude that in all but extreme circumstances, the provinces must not be divested of primary jurisdiction over public health. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 12:49 pm by Renae Lloyd
According to reports, the Duff & Phelps Select MLP and Midstream Energy Fund Inc. announced that it will redeem all outstanding shares of the 4.65% Series B Preferred Shares (CUSIP No. 26433F3#3), effective April 15, 2020 (the redemption date). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:05 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Horizon Pharma USA, Inc. is a good reminder that even standard “patent lingo” can cause trouble down the line. [read post]
Not only would the WMA abolish covenants not to compete nationwide, outside of the extremely narrow exceptions highlighted above, but it would also provide the Department of Labor (DOL) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with broad enforcement power. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION In Re SAVAN THACH Debtor : : : : : : Case No. 19-10514 Chapter 13 Judge Hopkins ORDER DIRECTING ATTORNEYS H. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) 5.30% 31 0.35% 5.65% 41 0.70% Vt. 6.00% 17 0.22% 6.22% 36 1.00% W.Va. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Board then appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court's ruling, explained that "[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, and courts may only vacate an arbitrator's award on the grounds specified in CPLR §7511(b). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Board then appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court's ruling, explained that "[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, and courts may only vacate an arbitrator's award on the grounds specified in CPLR §7511(b). [read post]
Advances in testing technology are occurring at a rapid rate because nationwide legalization is seemingly inevitable, and thus, a consensus-best testing method would be extremely lucrative. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no allegation that defendants made any representation to the children or that defendants engaged in any extreme and outrageous conduct (see Hernandez v Central Parking Sys. of N.Y., Inc., 63 AD3d 411 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]