Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z"
Results 261 - 280
of 299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2009, 6:53 pm
The contract has terms X, Y, and Z. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
California legislation regulates privacy and personal information in ways similar to the new 2009 HITECH Act that modifies HIPAA.Reads section 1798.82 of the California Civil Code: (a) Any person or business that conducts business in California, and that owns or licenses computerized data that includes personal information, shall disclose any breach of the security of the system following discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the data to any resident of California whose… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
There, Arnt was charged with murder (X, the greater offense) as well as voluntary manslaughter (Y, the lesser offense) and, as here, the jury acquitted on X but convicted on Y. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Example 1: The label of a dietary supplement containing "X" uses the following claims: "The amino acid 'X' is the chemical precursor to nitric oxide. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 9:04 am
Stan Y.. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
Can Y add Z to this account without X's consent? [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:10 am
One which I'll illustrate with the following hypothetical, which is an extreme application of the principle:In 1993, the rules in murder cases allow introduction of X, Y and Z into evidence to prove an offense. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:35 am
Me: Well, obviously it is a down economy, but I think I am a strong candidate because of [X Y and Z]. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 10:56 am
In Box v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
In Benz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
Z. or Dr. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:55 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:59 pm
Y., Dr. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:23 pm
For the non-lawyers among you, that means that if the contract says “x”, and warns the reader that it contains all terms of the deal, and the grownup signed the contract, the grownup cannot later argue “oh, but they told me it was also y and z. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:49 am
Sure, sometimes we may vote for Candidate X even though we prefer Candidate Y because we don't think Y would have the votes, and we prefer X to Z. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:01 pm
David X. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
There has to be some particular reason why X should be held to have assumed responsibility for protecting Y from Z. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:17 pm
V is for the vote swapping websites that popped up during the federal election. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:34 pm
The Western Climate Initiative, including California and several Western States, have proposed a greenhouse gas emission reporting rule that would cover the following industries: (A) Adipic acid manufacturing (B) Aluminum production (C) Ammonia manufacturing (D) Cement production (E) Coal mine fugitive emissions (active and abandoned) (F) Cogeneration (G) Electricity generation (H) Electronics Manufacturing (I) Ferroalloy production (J) Glass Production and other uses of… [read post]
