Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 261 - 280
of 11,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 11:30 pm
However, closer examination reveals at least two significant differences. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:41 am
I believe that at this point Judge Newman will have the ability to immediately appeal the denial of preliminary relief to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:52 am
However, this required an audit, Tax Court litigation, and an appeal of the $9 million proposed deficiency. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
In the following guest post, Dan Aronowitz, President of Encore [formerly Euclid] Fiduciary, examines the new lawsuit and assesses what it may represent. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has released its second report examining significant developments in technologies that could affect privacy in coming years. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
In fact, the limitation at issue is found in dependent claims and were not mentioned by the examiner in her reasons for allowance. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Philpot had provided copies of his work for the limited purpose of examination, without a present grant of a right of further distribution. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Then, the justices read a summarized version of two opinions they were announcing for the day, which included Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
State Farm The Maryland Court of Appeals answered this question incorrectly in Stickley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. https://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/fsa.8b02003The trademark examiner ruled that OCF could not trademark the color pink because it covered the entirety of the product and OCF appealed the decision to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
When instructing the jury, the trial court read the elements for forcible sexual offense, but did not read separate instructions for each count charged, or notify the jury that defendant was charged with two separate counts of the offense. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
On Sunday, our post included this hypothetical about the Respondents' reading of the Sinecure Clause. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
School of Law (for more, read the whole thing): Howard University School of Law expelled Michael Newman. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:25 am
In examination and opposition proceedings before the EUIPO as well as in appeal proceedings before the Boards of Appeal of the EUIPO, the corresponding oral proceedings shall, as a norm, be held in public (whereas oral proceedings before the examination and opposition panels were originally intended to be not public). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The book offers lucid answers to the dilemmas posed by the problem under examination. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:54 am
The Court concluded that his complaint did not raise a separate issue under Articles 10, 11 and 14 of the Convention and fell to be examined solely under Article 9 [62]. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
So the judgment did not need to examine the defences that it was true that Mr Fox was a racist, or that it was an honest opinion that Mr Fox was racist. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
”[vi] On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Inforrm, the Guardian cover the judgment and Seymour’s response to the ruling can be read here. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
