Search for: "A. R. v. State Department of Human Resources" Results 261 - 280 of 734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2010, 3:18 pm by NL
The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Shelter came in as interested party and intervener respectively. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Throughout his period of leave, he maintained regular contact with the union, as well as the city’s human resources department. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 4:23 am
"*** The New York State's Human Rights Law, [Executive Law §296(15)] and the New York City's Human Rights Law [Administrative Code §8-107(10)] also prohibit rejection of applicants for public employment based solely on a criminal conviction.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.nycourts.gov] [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 6:43 am by Dean Freeman
Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General, one in every three nursing home patient suffers some type of medication error, acquired infection or other harm. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) rather than National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Indeed, Betsy came in the midst of the passing of Oklahoma version of state anti-immigrant law. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
P 27…  Finally, the Trappers presented the views of Craig McLaughlin, Ph.D., who holds a doctorate in Wildlife Ecology and is employed as Wildlife Program Chief for the state of Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, and Dana R. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm by Dave
 Further, at [68], any such assessment … would be extraordinarily burdensome in terms of cost and resources and – in the overwhelming number of cases – simply futile. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm by NL
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]