Search for: "AB 1" Results 261 - 280 of 5,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 11:55 pm by Juana Vasella
StGB) unmittelbar verletzt sein und damit als Geschädigter im Sinne nach Art. 115 Abs. 1 StPO gelten, der sich gemäss Art. 118 Abs. 1 StPO als Privatkläger am Strafverfahren beteiligen kann. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Will Troutman (US)
As of January 1, 2025, AB 1817 prohibits the manufacture, distribution, sale, or offer for sale in the state of “any new, not previously used, textile articles that contain regulated” PFAS substances. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:41 am by Zijian Han
Background ABS Global Inc. and Genus plc (collectively, ABS) petitioned for an inter partes review of claims 1, 2, 6, 8, and 9 of U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:39 am by Daniel A. Thompson
The following are some of the most prominent changes that will take effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Assembly Bill No. 819 (AB 819), was signed by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State on July 16, 2021, and as non-urgency legislation will become effective on January 1, 2022. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:52 am by Kevin MacNeill and Josh Owings (US)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) recently said that it will take another look at California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51), a state law affecting mandatory employment-related arbitration agreements.[1AB 51 prohibits employers from requiring that employees enter into mandatory arbitration agreements for disputes arising under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act and the California Labor Code. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  As introduced, AB 55 would have amended the Elections Code. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 7:37 am by Gene Takagi
In 2021, California passed a new set of laws (referred to as AB 488) regulating charitable crowdfunding that go into effect on January 1, 2023. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:56 pm
The criteria for qualifying as a "Subject Matter Expert” are much more specific and stringent than before: 1. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm by Hector Agdeppa and Theodore Mayer*
Cytonome then argued ABS’s appeal should be dismissed because ABS lacked standing in light of the disclaimer.[1] While the Federal Circuit was amenable to Cytonome’s standing argument[2], it found that mootness was the proper framework to assess justiciability under the circumstances. [read post]