Search for: "ADAMS v. STATE" Results 261 - 280 of 5,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Adam Clayton Powell IV sued to stop the City of New York from rebuilding a waste-management facility on the Upper East Side because state approval of the project hadn't been secured. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:08 pm by Adam Thimmesch
Dilworth Co., 322 U.S 327 (1944); General Trading Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
A claimant will ordinarily be unable to obtain an interim injunction to restrain an apprehended alleged defamatory publication where a defendant states an intention to raise an affirmative defence. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Eric Appleby
R. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 2:44 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
”  In the blog post, Adam shares some of his observations about the CFSA Decision, a decision that he views as raising “the most important administrative-state issues of our time. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 7:59 am by Rick Hasen
Adam Liptak for the NYT: The first case cited as precedent in the first Supreme Court brief filed by lawyers for President Trump since he took office this year was Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:48 am by Howard Bashman
United States: SCOTUS to address the binding effect of non-majority opinions. [read post]