Search for: "ADDIT LLCĀ " Results 261 - 280 of 20,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 7:19 pm by Scott McKeown
Neo Wireless LLC, IPR2023-00763 (Nov. 9, 2023), and (American Honda Motor Co, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 am by Kyle Krull
You must discuss the pros and cons of forming an LLC to manage the property or becoming tenants in common. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
Bakotic Pathology Associates, LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-03918-TWT-JCF) in U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  In addition, the owners of the partnership or LLC may delegate authority to negotiate such long-term contracts on their behalf, so long as the delegation of authority does not exceed one year (or, if shorter, the minimum needs of the industry). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:54 pm by Eleanor Vaida Gerhards
   Because Hooter’s provision failed to specify the real scope of that additional restriction, the court failed to enforce it. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:51 am by Jeffrey Neuburger
., FTC No. 2123038 In re InMarket Media, LLC, FTC No. 2023088 In re Avast Limited, FTC No. 2023033 Two of the actions involved the collection of location data and the third involved the collection of browsing-related information. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:07 am by Shane McCall
Protester Global Patent Solutions, LLC (GPS), challenged award under the solicitation to CPA Global, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
Another oddity about this proposed legislation is that only California corporations would be at risk for an additional fine because corporations formed under another jurisdiction's laws would not come within the definition of a "corporation". [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:08 am by Stuart Kaplow
Additional federal judicial reviews were filed by the State of Louisiana, et al, the Texas Alliance of Energy Producers, et al, and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al, each in the Fifth Circuit; the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, et al in the Sixth Circuit; the State of Iowa, et al in the Eighth Circuit; and, the State of West Virginia in the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am by Nedim Malovic
Vortic LLC (2021), where a refurbisher of old Hamilton pocket watches found itself on the right side of the law and did not infringe Hamilton’s trade mark rights since there was no likelihood of confusion.February 2024, a trade mark infringement case was decided by the Swiss Supreme Court in litigation between Rolex and an un-named Swiss defendant (but widely reported to be the aforementioned atelier Artisans de Geneve) [see here]. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 11:25 pm
.# # #Ravin Crossbows Recalls Ravin R500 Series Crossbows Due to Injury HazardName of Product:Ravin R500 Model CrossbowsHazard:If nearly but not fully cocked, the crossbow can discharge unexpectedly while consumers cock or uncock the crossbow, posing an injury hazard.Remedy:RepairRecall Date:March 21, 2024Units:About 13,300 (In addition, about 425 were sold in Canada)Consumer ContactRavin Crossbows toll-free at 888-298-6335 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 10:48 am by Wiggam Law
Having bank accounts, retirement accounts, or other assets in a foreign country could mean that you have to file additional paperwork every tax year. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:07 am by The White Law Group
His record indicates that he has had four employment separations, a financial disclosure, and six customer disputes in addition to the above regulatory action. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:22 am by Ginger Buck
 This is in addition to the more than $5 billion we have recovered for the firm’s other clients, including two of the top five antitrust settlements in U.S. history. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jay Butchko
For more information, please contact the Law Offices of Steinhardt, Siskind and Lieberman, LLC. [read post]
If you have any questions or need additional information on the impact this case may have on your unionized workforce, please contact Patrick W. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm by Joshua Smeltzer
Supp. 2d 1140 (D.N.M. 2012), that taxpayers should have treated the LLC’s income as self-employment income. [read post]