Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The first is Secretary of State for Health and Ors v Servier Laboratories and Ors. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am by Lisa Meller and Sophie Davis
A more recent example is Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd (2018) where the court stated that when considering reasonable steps to mitigate, a party should consider the interests of both contracting parties and not just its own. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 6:19 am by Chukwuma Okoli
  This rule as applied in Nigeria  –  often referred to as the  Mocambique  rule  –  is derived from the English case of British South Africa Company v Companhia de Mocambique [1893] AC 602. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton… [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am by Sophie Corke
The (supposed) test The leading case on professional advisors’ potential conflict of interest is Bolkiah v KPMG [1999] 2 AC 222¸where professional advisors (in an analogous position to solicitors) formerly acted for an applicant who then wished to restrain them from acting for its opponent. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:08 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Supreme Court Hears Copyright Battle Between Google and Oracle First off today, Adam Liptak at The New York Times reports that the Supreme Court of the United States heard arguments in the Google v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm by Giles Peaker
As stated in Woodfall at paragraph 17.181, “In the eyes of equity, the proviso for re-entry was merely a “security” for the rent. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:04 am by steve cornforth blog
This the case of Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 237, that just predated my time at Vauxhall. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court in Khuja v Times Newspapers [2019] AC 161 proceeded on the basis that the rule was good law. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
Twenty years later, in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, the Court of Appeal purportedly (in the words of the Supreme Court yesterday) followed the Prudential decision, reiterating the Foss v Harbottle rule and holding that a shareholder cannot sue for the recovery of a diminution in the value of his shares or in distributions, where that loss flows from loss suffered by the company and that company has a cause of action to recover… [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
Motherwell v Motherwell ((1976) 73 DLR (3d) 62) and Wainwright v Home Office ([2004] 2 AC 406) expressly contemplated nuisance’s application to privacy. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Jessica Kroeze
An apparatus state detector that detects states of at least one apparatus comprising:measuring means (110) that is configured to measure a physical quantity of an environment in which the apparatus is placed, said physical quantity being any of a value of current supplied to the apparatus, a flow rate of water used by the apparatus, a flow rate of gas used by the apparatus, illuminance of the environment in which the apparatus is installed, a temperature of the environment in which… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
  This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 12:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Legal Approach Questions of insurance coverage interpretation are decided as a matter of state – and not federal – law. [read post]