Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 261 - 280
of 815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s “first set of votes on the Supreme Court” to determine whether they “present a picture that may (1) differentiate him from some of the other conservative justices and (2) help us understand where exactly he fits in the Court’s ideological spectrum. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
” Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:30 pm
Kennedy's retirement, I predicted that Chief Justice John Roberts, a staunch institutionalist when it comes to the Supreme Court, would serve as a moderating influence at SCOTUS -- and so far that seems to be the case, with Adam Feldman noting a "a mild liberalizing over time" in JGR's jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:10 pm
Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS argued that the Chief Justice “has exerted some clear movement to the left” since joining the bench. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman uses the Supreme Court Database to “assess the extent to which [Chief Justice John] Roberts has moved left versus the Court moving right. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 5:12 pm
” Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the justices’ frequency in the majority over time, concluding that “[w]hatever led to the past high level of consensus no longer holds quite as true. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 2:30 pm
[Bench Memos / National Review] * Don't be fooled by the high level of unanimity in the Supreme Court's first few decisions of the Term; greater disagreement lurks in the "shadow docket," as Adam Feldman explains. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines agreement among the justices on this term’s “shadow docket. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
Adam Feldman crunches the numbers -- and the dominance of the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 3:37 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman tracks the involvement of “friends of the court” at the certiorari stage “in cases with direct financial implications that the justices later heard on the merits between the 2008 and 2018 Court terms. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm
Adam Feldman offers this analysis. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
, Pay for performance, Proxy advisors, Section 162(m), Shareholder voting Program Hiring Post-Graduate Academic Fellows Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance & Financial Regulation, on , on Monday, January 28, 2019 Tags: Program on Corporate Governance Arbitration with Uninformed Consumers Posted by Mark Egan (Harvard Business School), Gregor Matvos (University of Texas at Austin), Amit Seru (Stanford University), on Monday,… [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
“Looking Back to Assess the Potential Future of Oral Arguments”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 2:30 pm
* Adam Feldman explores the possible effect on the Supreme Court of replacing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a staunch conservative -- e.g., Judge Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am
’” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes recent instances in which a liberal Supreme Court justice has been replaced by a much more conservative successor. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:35 am
“Why Ginsburg’s Seat Could be the Left’s Biggest Loss Yet”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 2:30 pm
" [Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle] * The current Term of the Supreme Court doesn't boast many blockbusters -- but some cases are more interesting than others, as Adam Feldman points out. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:49 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “takes [a] cut at measuring cases that generated the most interest so far this term, much like a snapshot of the current Supreme Court landscape. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:35 am
” Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
