Search for: "Adam Kent"
Results 261 - 280
of 494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the changing nature of Supreme Court cases involving the “scope of executive power,” looking at past cases, as well as past and pending cert petitions, to assess how such questions might arise in relation to a Donald Trump presidency. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 10:58 am
She left the Illinois Attorney General's office to join the faculty at Chicago Kent and recently moved to Cumberland. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in King comes from Laurence Tribe in The Boston Globe, Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times, Adam Zimmerman at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re at PrawfsBlawg, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, Richard Pierce at the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Leland Beck at the Federal Regulations Advisor, Lisa Keen of the Keen News Service, Joan Krause at Hamilton and… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
” And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the denial of review in the case of death-row inmate Joseph Duncan. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences Blog laments the denial of cert. in Allen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger suggests that the statute’s requirement that the body armor have moved in interstate commerce is a “very tenuous hook” under the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
” Kent Scheidegger comments on the case at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
News) covered the stay, while Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
"This outcome is disappointing for anyone who believes that open innovation benefits users and promotes creativity and competition," said Kent Walker, Google's senior vice president and general counsel, in a statement. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
Other coverage of the case comes from Joan Biskupic of USA Today, Adam Liptak of the New York Times, Nina Totenberg of NPR, the Washington Post, Reuters, AP, CNN, ABC News, and the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that during yesterday’s second argument, in McKinney v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the other summary reversal, in Kernan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am
Commentary on yesterday’s grants comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 7:30 am
Conference chairs:-Larry Kramer / Dean, Stanford Law School-Lawrence Lessig / Professor of Law, Stanford Law School; Founder andCo-Director, Center for Internet and Society-Kent Walker / General Counsel, GoogleConference Speakers:-Jamie Boyle / Professor of Law, Duke Law School; Co Founder, Centerfor the Study of the Public Domain-Tim Bresnahan / Landau Professor in Technology & the Economy,Stanford University-Michael Callahan / Executive Vice President, General Counsel… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on a study by Richard Hasen which concludes that Justice Antonin Scalia is the Court’s most sarcastic Justice; other coverage of and commentary on the study come from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences and Hasen himself at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:14 am
Calabresi, Michael Kent Curtis, Michael A. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Adam Liptak of The New York Times suggests that it is a “pity that Justice Thomas has withdrawn from an important part of the court’s work” and notes that were he “to talk, people would listen. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Our own Kent Scheidegger disagrees with the Graham decision and "extending it to homicides would be wrong squared. [read post]
