Search for: "Adoption of Barnett"
Results 261 - 280
of 449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2017, 7:21 am
Barnette. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:28 am
Jonathan Barnett, for instance, looks at the changes the FTC has made over the past year to its public statements of mission and priorities, alongside its potential rulemaking activity, to discuss the commission’s changing thinking about free markets. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:47 am
Congress may have considerable latitude in adopting mandates that facilitate regulation of interstate commerce. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), and Hurley v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
As he explains "Rather than adopt an interpretive approach based on one’s values, however, an originalist ought to discern the original meaning in the most accurate way possible. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Even where there is a statutory right of appeal – which, under Vavilov, leads to de novo review – a court might legitimately adopt the decision-maker’s interpretation as its own. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
In our view, ‘the reasons that originally led’ other courts to adopt ‘the rule have long since disappeared. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Barnett and Bernick). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:30 am
Wells-Barnett, Carrie Chapman Catt, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Florence Kelley, Mary Church Terell, Lillian Wald, among many others. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 9:48 am
As the University of Southern California’s Jonathan Barnett shows, the empirical evidence suggests that competition in digital markets is not only possible but, in many cases, quite intensive. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:17 am
My ICLE colleagues Dirk Auer, Brian Albrecht, and Jonathan Barnett did too, among others. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:44 pm
As Randy Barnett points out in his reply to Rosen, the Court is highly unlikely to adopt a rule that requires it to carefully scrutinize Congress’ collective action arguments. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:15 am
Louis attorney Richard Sindel made a similar argument on behalf of Barnett. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
And it made a difference; in 2017, Kent Barnett and Christopher J. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 8:59 am
Although the risk of employment law litigation cannot be eradicated completely, employers who adopt a proactive approach to managing these risks can significantly reduce the likelihood of costly litigation. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 5:31 am
UPDATE: Both Randy Barnett and Larry Solum have graciously recommended this piece, and in return I want to thank both of them for the influence they have had on my thinking on these questions. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
Barnette, 2007 U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
Bebchuk (Harvard Law School), on Friday, June 7, 2024 Tags: Activists, CEOs, Delaware General Corporation Law, Institutional Investors, stockholders Investor statement in support of Climate Action 100+ Posted by Jake Barnett, CalSTRS, on Saturday, June 8, 2024 Tags: assets, Climate, climate action, Climate Action 100+, climate risk, investors Takeaways from SEC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
The answer is simple: They have to posit that there are five votes on the current US Supreme Court to adopt Bailey and other pre-1937 relics in circumstances like the following: Obama and his allies have successfully surmounted both the institutional obstacles created by our hard-wired Constitution (e.g., the ridiculous power given in the Senate to provincials like Max Baucus and Olympia Snowe and the other members of the "gang of six," who represent, in toto, 2.77% of the entire… [read post]
