Search for: "Adoption of Graham" Results 261 - 280 of 807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
France France has adopted data protection laws consistent with the GDPR. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Three years ago a report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism recommended, adopting an analogy with sexual offences prevention orders, that the Crown Prosecution Service should undertake a “review to examine the applicability of prevention orders to hate crime offences and if appropriate, take steps to implement them. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
Pauly and numerous other cases when it denied qualified immunity notwithstanding the absence of clearly established law imposing liability under circumstances closely analogous to those confronting the petitioner in this case; and (2) whether the lower court improperly departed from the Supreme Court’s decisions in Graham v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood provides useless blather to accompany Monday’s relists. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:30 pm
In the words of Republican Senator Lindsay Graham, Trump can end this “with a phone call. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am by Gene Quinn
” “[T]his Court has never adopted a “looks like” test to determine if an adjudication has improperly occurred outside of an Article III court,” the Supreme Court found. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am by Florian Mueller
The fact that SSOs— those with the most knowledge of the issues—adopt FRAND policies is itself telling proof that holdup is a problem; otherwise, why would they adopt contractual practices to prevent holdup? [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
As Howard Jay Graham, one of the leading historians on the 14th Amendment, concluded, Conkling had engaged in “a deliberate, brazen forgery” to win new rights for corporations. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm by Marcia Shein
Graham, Jr., Federal Practice & Procedure: Evidence § 5244, 500 (1978)). [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Michael A. Livermore
If this is the case, then the new policies adopted by an electoral winner to replace existing policies will not better comport with what most people want. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
(Levy largely adopts that tone in his article, and honestly, he should know better, after so long covering these issues.) [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 10:59 am by Wenqing Zhao, David Stanton
Sensetime specializes in image recognition, particularly the type of face, movement, and object recognition that Chinese law enforcement agencies and local police departments are increasingly adopting. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 13 April 2018 Warby J handed down public and private judgments in two “right to be forgotten” cases: NT1 and NT2 v Google (public judgment [2018] EWHC 799 (QB)). [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Wenqing Zhao, David Stanton
The proposed tariffs had been closely anticipated since March 22, when the USTR concluded, after a seven-month investigation, that the Chinese government had adopted unfair trade practices in order to acquire American intellectual property and technological know-how. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Wenqing Zhao, David Stanton
The proposed tariffs had been closely anticipated since March 22, when the USTR concluded, after a seven-month investigation, that the Chinese government had adopted unfair trade practices in order to acquire American intellectual property and technological know-how. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Michael Risch
And in Bill Graham Archives, the court said that there was no market for taking concert posters and putting them in coffee table books. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:04 pm by David B. Kopel
" She felt that "adopting this name was akin to 'turning the other cheek.'" (p. 66). [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 2:47 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
The court found multiple, broad-based issues with the PEIR, including, for example, a decision that the PEIR violates CEQA “because it adopts an unlawful tiering strategy, granting the Department authority to implement a broad range of practices without evaluating the site-specific conditions to determine whether the environmental impacts were covered in the PEIR. [read post]