Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
According to this doctrine, foreign governments are denied immunity when they engage in conduct based on commercial activity carried out in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am by SHG
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  So far, the federal government has unsuccessfully fought RFRA’s application to the use of illegal drugs in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, the rule would revise the definition of spouse under the FMLA in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
The plaintiffs' claims are brought under the 5th Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which the Supreme Court has interpreted to require the federal government to afford the same "equal protection of the law" to all Americans that the 14th Amendment expressly requires the states to afford to their residents. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Both state that they `[a]ppl[y] to civilian employees of the DoD Components,’ and their restrictions on direct participation in civilian law enforcement `apply to all actions of DoD personnel worldwide,’ with `DoD personnel’ defined to include `Federal military officers and enlisted personnel and civilian employees of the Department of Defense. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Two-faced federal prosecutors, a state prosecutor who needs to chill on Netflix, and an iconic naked baby.] [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am by Marissa Miller
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]