Search for: "Appeal of at & T Information Systems"
Results 261 - 280
of 9,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2025, 12:30 am
In support of moving away from an approach based on a rigid dichotomy, the Board of Appeal cited previous decisions T 1138/20 and T 1634/17. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:51 am
We note that there have been some informal discussions on the appellate review mechanism, which touch on issues of leave to appeal and standard of review. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:38 pm
I don't get it.I don't see much value or merit in Epic's case without a single-brand market definition. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:45 am
They can barely manage to care for the approximately 6,000 horses already in the system. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:45 am
In this appeal in opposition, the opponent filed a Japanese prior art document E10 and a barely understandable machine translation E10* with the grounds of appeal. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
It appears T-Mobile is broadly seeking to enforce its trademark rights outside of telecommunication and information technology services. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:43 am
Posts featured in "CDT Fellows Focus" don't necessarily reflect the views of CDT; the goal of the series is to present diverse, well-informed views on significant tech policy issues. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
If the certificate isn’t truthful, then the lawyer ends up giving an opinion on title based on information that isn’t correct. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
The same applies to independent system claims 3 and 12. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
T 1962/08 [5.2.4(a)]).[3.5] According to the established case law of the Boards of appeal due care regarding missed time limits is considered to have been taken when the failure to keep the time limit was caused either by extraordinary circumstances such as e.g. illness (no such circumstances have been invoked in the present case) or resulted from an “isolated mistake within an otherwise satisfactory system” (cf. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:47 pm
Small business government contractors should be mindful when implementing email spam systems, recognizing that the government may send time-sensitive, critical information via email. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:01 pm
This appeal was against the revocation of the patent under consideration by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
Claim 1 of the appellant's main request reads as follows:"A safety and security system for a definite area comprising sensors (110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180) fit for capturing a first set of instant-track data (300) on a first set of objects (200) located in said area or in the vicinity thereof, said first set of instant-track data comprising at least real-time 3D position and speed data from at least one sensor on at least one of the objects of said first set of objects,… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:13 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:30 am
Government information systems. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
As new rules and administrative guidance comes out regarding the Medicare post-payment audit appeals process, check back with us for more information. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
The appellant finally requested that the appeal fee be reimbursed.The reasons for the final decision of the Board read: [1] Although the present appeal was withdrawn from consideration by the Board of Appeal in respect of admissibility and allowability, the Board of Appeal, in the exercise of its inherent power, is authorised to examine the appellant's request for reimbursement of the appeal fee (see T 41/82 and J 12/86). [2] According to A… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:36 am
Further information on the status of Amazon's one-click patents and the appeal decision T 1616/08 may be obtained here and here. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:42 pm
The County appealed. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm
The appeal is admissible.2. [read post]
