Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases"
Results 261 - 280
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
During this time, our users have been the subject of nearly 50 court cases brought by employers across 14 states. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Advice to Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson: There is Arizona’s former Gov. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:43 am
The case involves an employee who, in advance of a meeting with management about working conditions, posted to her Facebook ; and On May 17, the NLRB secured a temporary injunction from a U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Southern Pacific Co., 79 Ariz. 253 (1955), the leading case in this area, the Supreme Court of Arizona rejected the argument that defendants now press: [W]e fail to understand why, as a practical matter, an employer will refuse to adopt such rules when by their adoption and enforcement the accident would not occur - at least through fault of the employer's servants. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:00 pm
Arizona Arizona does not have any travel restrictions in place for out-of-state travelers. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:08 pm
In case you missed it, Justia Ask A Lawyer is a free forum that enables users to anonymously submit their questions about the law and legal issues. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
[See Lyle Denniston's "primer" on all of the tobacco cases above for an extensive discussion of their questions presented.] [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:51 pm
In some cases, retirees can receive more than the PBGC maximum guarantee. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the meantime, let’s look at a case recently decided in Arizona federal court. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the meantime, let’s look at a case recently decided in Arizona federal court. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the meantime, let’s look at a case recently decided in Arizona federal court. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Arizona Life Coalition, et al. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
Morrissey-Berru, in which the court considered the scope of the “ministerial exception” to federal employment discrimination laws. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Significant New Non-Compete Cases Keep Employers On Their Toes Employers were kept on their toes with some significant non-compete decisions which forced some employers to update their agreements and onboarding/exiting practices. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
And what about cases that go the other way? [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
In addition to these potential civil liability exposures, Covered Entities, their business associates and other individuals or organizations that wrongfully use, access or disclose electronic or other protected health information also can face civil liability under various circumstances. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Although the Supreme Court would later decide that Title IX and Title VII should be interpreted differently with respect to institutional and employer liability for harassment (see Gebser v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
Arizona v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
As of this writing, the judge has not ruled in this case. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
Sebelius Injunction In April, the United States District Court for Arizona certified a class of Medicare beneficiaries and enjoined CMS from putting recovery claims into collections while pending a waiver or compromise request. [read post]
