Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2021, 6:01 am
Judgment dismissing the appeal was given by Lewison LJ; with whom Arnold and Asplin LLJs agreed. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
DUI defense attorney Brian E Arnold offers a free consultation if you are facing any criminal charges including Felony DUI. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am
On 24 December 2020, we posted an update on the EU27 temporary transitional measures. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent in the Baltimore case. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Brian Arnold offers a free consultation involving family law and divorce cases. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:31 pm
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison and Arnold and Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Bentley Motors Limited v Bentley 1962 Limited and another [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (16 Dec2020)This was an appeal by Bentley Motors Limited against Judge Hacon's decision in Bentley 1962 Ltd and another v Bentley Motors Ltd [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch) (1 Nov 2019) which I discussed in Trade Marks - Bentley 1962 Ltd [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
” Nice try, but no banana (AMS Neve v Heritage Audio [2020] EWHC 1876 (June 2020))The only non pay-walled coverage I can find is via Lexology, I cannot find this case on Bailii! [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for legal malpractice, alleging that the defendants Arnold Kronick and Arnold Kronick, L.P. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 10:06 am
It's about how to apply the Huawei v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
Lord Justice Arnold recapped the current position in England and Wales with regards to website-blocking, noting 20th Century Fox v BT (Newzbin 2) wherein he granted the first such injunction in 2011, and the first application and injunction in relation to trade marks in Cartier v Sky. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
Never Too Late 292 [Week ending November 22] [Guest post] The Implementation of Article 17 CDSMD in EU Member States and the Evolution of the Digital Services Act: Why the Ban on General Monitoring Obligations Must Not Be Underestimated | Cannabis, conceptual comparison, and online evidence: Tertulia on EUIPO Boards of Appeal Case Law November 2020 | Mind the gap: Beijing IP Court explains the adverse effect clause of China’s Trade Mark Law | [Guest… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:34 am
The applicant had previously, on September 20, 2018, been granted such an injunction by Justice Richard Arnold (as he was at the time) , but that order had expired on the 1st of October 2020, by virtue of a “sunset clause” contained in the order. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am
The three-step Coco v AN Clark test was applied to the dispute. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:22 am
[A court order, in Kelly Hyman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 9:01 am
Keeping with that trend, Bostock v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
Arnold LJ focused on a point made clear by Lord Hoffmann in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
