Search for: "Arnold v. D" Results 261 - 280 of 579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
If the [d]ocumentary had merely used a number of excerpts from the [c]oncert [v]ideo, and hence of the [c]opyright [w]orks, then that might well have been reasonable having regard to the transformative purpose. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
A mark can only acquired distinctiveness, as summarized by Judge Hacon and his review of extensive consideration by Justice Arnold in Europcar, through use as a consequence of which the mark indicates to the relevant class of persons the exclusive origin of the goods or services concerned. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:50 am
 So it is with slight delay that the IPKat comes to the latest decision in the apparently endless Hospira v Genentech saga. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He’d hate having a decent judge abdicate responsibility to experts, who can be appalling. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:49 am by Kirk Jenkins
Arnold that an explanation of reasons must be included in a Rule 137 order whether or not sanctions are imposed. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:46 am by Jim Walker
In 2004, Carnival received an ‘F’ grade for its sewage treatment practices and a "D" for air pollution reduction. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis; the Court of Appeal has its say on second medical use claims in the UKIPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that, earlier this year, Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means [see blog posts here and here]. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 45 [week ending on Sunday 10 May] – INTA 2015 and the Kat | IP and Competition Law | Sky v Skype | CJEU v Spain | Digital Single Market Strategy | IPCom v HTC | European Qualifying Examination appealed | UPC fees | CJEU and 3-D marks | EPO Oral Proceedings.Never too late 44  [week ending on Sunday 3 May] – Forgotten principles and histories, and… [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
MICHAEL ARNOLD, JANET ARNOLD, STEVE SOUTH AS TRUSTEE AND ON BEHALF OF THE SOUTH LIVING TRUST, JOHN S. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
   In conducting legal research of his own, Mr Justice Arnold relied on two further cases that had not been cited in argument. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:22 am
The jiplp weblog features a review by Mr Justice Arnold on the economics of copyright which concludes with an expression of regret that it was not available to the Court of Appeal when it adopted the incremental costs rule in Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1419 [on which see the AmeriKat's posts here and here]. [read post]