Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 261 - 280 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
United States, Washington DC Injury Lawyer Blog, November 16, 2012 Supreme Court Rules that Federal Law Preempts State Wrongful Death Lawsuit Over Asbestos Exposure: Kurns v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  There were lots of different asbestos products, and the same kinds of asbestos products do (or, at least, plaintiffs allege they do) have similar risks. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm by Bexis
June 7, 2005) – all holding that the heeding presumption is limited to strict liability and that Pennsylvania bars use of strict liability in prescription medical product litigation. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[t]he reasoning in both the George and White cases is applicable”), aff’d, 44 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 1995); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:47 pm by Editor
Judge Eduardo Robreno, the judge who oversees the multidistrict maritime asbestos litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (MDL 875), recently held a ship is not a product and, therefore, not subject to liability under traditional product liability and strict liability principles. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:26 am
Once summary judgment is denied, many asbestos defendants with questionable liability will often settle out rather than risk the financial exposure of an adverse result in a mesothelioma jury trial. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:06 am
The second Defendant had received thousands of asbestos-related claims in relation to asbestos products manufactured or distributed by it or its predecessors. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:52 pm by William A. Ruskin
District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presides over the federal Asbestos Products Liability Litigation consolidated Multidistrict Litigation docket (MDL 875), considered an issue of first impression under maritime law in Mack v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:03 am by William A. Ruskin
”  Such was the basis for the imposition of liability on the defendant trademark licensor in Lou v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 6:26 am by William A. Ruskin
Once summary judgment is denied, many asbestos defendants with questionable liability will often settle out rather than risk the financial exposure of an adverse result in a mesothelioma jury trial. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 3:35 pm
The lawsuit alleged that RFPC distributed products containing asbestos, and that Viad succeeded a company that manufactured and distributed products containing asbestos. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  On the good side of the ledger, the court throws out all of the usual bread & butter claims in prescription drug product liability litigation ? [read post]