Search for: "Austin v. Housing Authority"
Results 261 - 280
of 324
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
DAVIS Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, c2011 KF479 .D375 2011 See Catalog Choice (Psychology) RATIONAL CHOICE / EDITED BY JON ELSTER Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press, 1986 HB846.8 .R38 1986 See Catalog Christian ethics -- United States -- History THE MYTH OF AMERICAN RELIGIOUS FREEDOM / DAVID SEHAT Oxford [UK]; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011 BR516 .S43 2011 See Catalog Citation of legal authorities -- United States CITE-CHECKER: YOUR GUIDE TO… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
Update: It is interesting to contrast the Court’s willingness to give Congress more time to reconsider the Voting Rights Act in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:52 am
eDiscovery News Content and Considerations 9th Circuit Ruling Hinges on 'Exceeds Authorized Access' in CFAA - http://tinyurl.com/3tu5qja (Ginny LaRoe) Big Data and Tolkien’s Seeing Stone - http://tinyurl.com/42xr82v (Jon Neiditz, John Martin) Biglaw Litigators, Rejoice! [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:16 am
Sweatt v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that was hearing the case, Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (9th Circuit, 2011), Ms. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am
If the agency does not get enough GR funding they'll need new statutory authority to charge additional fees to fund their core operations. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:22 pm
The more substantive changes are these guidance on the length of grounds of appeal (UKSC PD3 para 3.1.2 and JCPC PD 3 para 3.1.2) and on chronologies in statements of facts and issues (UKSC PD 5 para 5.1.3 and JCPC PD 5 para 5.1.7); an express reference to the House of Lords’ Practice Statement of 26 July 1966 on judicial precedent and the passage in Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 making it clear that the statement… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:33 am
Miller v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:31 am
Ditto for "police monitors" like in Austin. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In England, discussion has been dominated by the House of Commons report [1] and Lord Lester’s law reform bill [2]. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
McCarthy: ‘Avoid extremes’ in trademark enforcement efforts (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential no. 5: Prompt supplementation of expert disclosure defeats motion to exclude testimony, says TTAB: General Council of the Assemblies of God dba Gospel Publishing House v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
The civil lawsuit, Beaty, et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
Paul, Minn. : Paragon House, 2008.EuropeKJC3104 .C6 2010Collective action and fundamental freedoms in Europe : striking the balance / edited by Edoardo Ales, Tonia Novitz ; contributors, Edoardo Ales ... [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
"It denigrates the staff, that's not helpful," she said of the creation of the subcommittee, adding that "it overreaches the authority of this committee. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Yohn Jr. in Teva v. [read post]
