Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 261 - 280
of 57,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Subchapter V Decision Tracker – Keep up to date on key legal developments. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Senior Benefits, LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 3:31 pm
See, e.g., Halliburton v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 11:19 am
§ 135(b). [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 10:24 am
Sentiments like these no doubt contributed to the Trump administrations efforts to terminate TPS designations for Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, a decision that was challenged by TPS beneficiaries and their U.S. citizen children in federal court in Ramos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:25 am
Since a cancellation application was pending against Elon Group’s EU trade mark no. 017946692 ‘ELON’, the Opposition Division based its conclusion that a likelihood of confusion (Art. 8(1)(b) EUTMR) existed on the earlier Swedish trade mark no. 551583 ‘ELON’. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
[B.] [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
Corbett v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
The UK Supreme Court decided, in the 2018 Miller v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am
Khan has not, for example, made any charges under Article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am
Pappas v B & G Holding Co. (2024 NY Slip Op 51218(U) [Sup Ct, Bronx County Sept. 6, 2024]), was reminiscent of the Worbes case I blogged about and then substituted in as counsel helping to bring the case to a successful conclusion – but with the parties’ roles reversed. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:25 am
En definitiva, tengamos claro que en principio es ilícito que un tercero grabe la conversación que mantenemos con él, lo sepa o no; A) Regla general: Si se mantiene una conversación, en que ambos participan de manera espontánea y con buena fe, cualquiera de los contertulios puede grabarla sin que ello entraña violación de “secreto alguno de comunicaciones” ni de “intimidad”, y ello aunque la conversación tome… [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:10 pm
Godagam & Edirisinghe v Hanson. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Lawrence B. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Pritchard and Robert B. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 11:33 am
The big change here, and it is a good one, is that the Tribunal determined rent can only be the lower of a) the market rent, or b) the landlord’s proposed rent. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:40 am
Today's advance release family law opinions: Hallock v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:18 am
” Epoxy: In J-B Weld Co., LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:45 am
In NFI Interactive Logistics LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 12:14 am
The opposition was brought under ss.5(2)(b) and 5(3) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994, i.e. confusing similarity and the protection of marks with a reputation. [read post]
