Search for: "BANKS v. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT" Results 261 - 280 of 1,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
District Courts—one in the Northern District of Virginia and the other in the District of Columbia—for a litany of bank fraud and tax evasion convictions. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
JESUSA ACOSTA, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00110-CV, 406 SW3d 711, 06-26-13) 13-0577 THE FREDERICKSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
That seems to demand judicial review, especially since the President and Congress had seemed to reach what Justice Powell described in a related context in Goldwater v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Pignoloni will take exclusively upon himself the obligation of child support paying to the wife 200/00 (two hundred/00 euros) ... for each son to be deposited, within the first five days of every month, in the bank checking account in the name of Mrs. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority, heard 1 – 2 February 2012. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
So, then we come to the decision in National Westminster Bank v Kotonou. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in two cases, First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Because “[a] party seeking to file an amended complaint postjudgment must first have the judgment vacated or set aside pursuant to [Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] 59(e) or 60(b),” Ruotolo v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Because “[a] party seeking to file an amended complaint postjudgment must first have the judgment vacated or set aside pursuant to [Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] 59(e) or 60(b),” Ruotolo v. [read post]