Search for: "BRACE V US"
Results 261 - 280
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
In fact, it has been established for well over a century that there is no difference between in-house and external solicitors: see Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, QBD.Next in time we get to Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v Moss [2013] UKUT 415 (LC).MPR had a 199 year lease of a property, which was owned by Thanet DC. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
In fact, it has been established for well over a century that there is no difference between in-house and external solicitors: see Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, QBD.Next in time we get to Metropolitan Property Realizations Ltd v Moss [2013] UKUT 415 (LC).MPR had a 199 year lease of a property, which was owned by Thanet DC. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:09 pm
McKinney v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm
The NRA has filed this amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:26 am
If they intend to launch before they have sufficiently cleared a path by invalidating the patentees' rights prior to launch (including on appeal), they better brace themselves for an injunction. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Their argument is based on an unpublished NJ Appellate Division decision, Bass v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 3:43 am
Despite the defendant’s argument that it was excessive, the verdict has been affirmed in Lemoine v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm
Shoop, one of a brace of public employee pension cases currently on the Court's docket. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-11 | Barry Sookman http://t.co/Cvy8vCt7SF -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-05-11: RT @AusCopyright: News Alert – High Court delivers reasons f… http://t.co/db5J2oxA2V -> Mandating disclosure of personal information for census purposes no Charter breach R v Finley, 2013 SKCA 47 http://t.co/3STTaTILF7 -> UK company's spyware 'used against Bahrain activist', court papers claim http://t.co/4NL4JO56Sv ->… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
Meade questions my word use in a previous post. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm
Harris and Florida v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Finally, the irrepressible Barbara Cookson gives SOLO IP readers her own personal evidence-based perspective on UK trade mark oppositions as we brace ourselves for another round of consultations. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
. when she was not wearing the [knee] brace . [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:02 am
The verdict has now been affirmed in Rutledge v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:22 pm
Scaffolding and other devices for use of employees at section (1) provides "[a]ll contractors and owners and their agents, except owners of one and two-family dwellings who contract for but do not direct or control the work, in the erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning or pointing of a building or structure shall furnish or erect, or cause to be furnished or erected for the performance of such labor, scaffolding, hoists, stays, ladders, slings, hangers, blocks,… [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
R. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 11:23 pm
In Morris v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Each of these Code Sections basically uses the same formula to calculate the required fee owing by a health insurance issuer or a self-insured plan sponsor. [read post]
