Search for: "BRIGGS "
Results 261 - 280
of 1,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2020, 3:39 am
On 17 and 18 March 2020 the Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Wilson and Briggs, Lady Arden and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 9:00 am
See Briggs v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:15 am
On January 15, 2020, the Coalition of American Vertical Engine Producers (Petitioner), consisting of Kohler Co. and Briggs & Stratton Corp., filed antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) petitions against Vertical Shaft Engines between 225 – 999 cc from China. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
On the Thornton issue, Lord Sumption (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Hodge and Briggs concurring) said: 7. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:53 pm
Briggs, No. 19-108 and United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:36 am
Briggs and United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
There are so many opportunities to get up and introduce yourself and then get feedback on your messaging (Think of me when…) There are a lot of business leads being shared by members and I’ve even heard some great presentations (on everything from time management to recent developments in employment law to the value of assessment tools like the Myers Briggs.) [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 3:57 pm
Briggs: Whether the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:36 pm
Briggs, No. 19-108 and United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
Grants in Briggs and Collins. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:48 am
The question arises in the case of Michael Briggs, a captain in the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
Briggs, 19-108Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
Lord Briggs determined that there are two ways in which insurers might be liable when faced with a non-party costs order: 1. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am
In [2017] EWCA Civ 2[4], Patten, Briggs and Sales LJJ dismissed the appeal, agreeing with Arnold J that the Hearing Officer had made no error of principle in considering the issue of outstanding benefit. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:10 pm
Moreover, the extension of the law in this case is a logical development conducive of a coherent legal principle on the basis that the gap between relief in relation to realty and relief in relation to personalty should, as Lord Briggs has explained, be closed so far as possible. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 7:47 am
Throughout the hearing, Lord Briggs most actively asked questions and made remarks. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
When the reliability of any inference from a UK ruling on the validity and essentiality of a patent with a view to the value of a global portfolio came up during yesterday's closing argument, Huawei's counsel first engaged in hyperbole (he said such inference was "100% wrong and it would be a dangerous work route to go down"), but then did the very opposite and agreed with statements by Lord Briggs and Lord Hodge that overstated the reliability of such… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 6:15 am
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:41 pm
Justice Birss's reasoning, is now on the Supreme Court--not on the panel hearing this case, but he appears to seize each and every opportunity, be it a Munich conference that I attended earlier this year or a recent interview with ManagingIP magazine, to advocate affirmance instead of letting his colleagues form their own opinion without a questionable kind of attempt to influence their thinking (indirectly, as I don't presume he actually talked to them about this case).It's hard to… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 2:00 am
This can be accomplished through social gatherings, as well as through the use of assessments such as Myers-Briggs or the DiSC Profile. [read post]
