Search for: "Banks, et al, v. Means" Results 261 - 280 of 514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
As has been many times pointed out, the means adopted by Congress of promoting the progress of science and the arts is the limited grant of the patent monopoly in return for the full disclosure of the patented invention and its dedication to the public on the expiration of the patent. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
CV Partners, Inc., et al., the federal district court in the Northern District of California dismissed state law based trade secrets claims as pre-empted by the federal Copyright Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by James P. Flynn
CV Partners, Inc., et al., the federal district court in the Northern District of California dismissed state law based trade secrets claims as pre-empted by the federal Copyright Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm by Monique Altheim
(see: “I Never Said That”—A Response to Cavoukian et al. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:02 am by A. Jennings Stone, III
Thomas, et. al. to either rule on the Bank's pending proposed Judgment and Order of Foreclosure or explain why the requirements were not satisfied. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Al Rajhi Bank 13-318Issue: (1) Whether the civil remedy provision of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:13 am by Dennis Crouch
CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL, ET AL., Docket No. 13-298 (Supreme Court 2013). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am by Lai Yip
On November 25, 2013, the jury in TQP Development, LLC v. 1-800-Flowers.com, et al., U.S.D.C., E.D. [read post]