Search for: "Barber v. Barber" Results 261 - 280 of 499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 4:51 am by Patricia Salkin
The opinion can be accessed at: http://rluipa-defense.com/docs/Tree-of-Life-Schools-v-Upper-Arlington.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by emagraken
There is no requirement that the cause of the adjournment be the fault of one party, see Serban, at paras. 9-11. [43] Further guidance is found in the following excerpt from Master Barber’s decision in Tieu v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by emagraken
There is no requirement that the cause of the adjournment be the fault of one party, see Serban, at paras. 9-11. [43] Further guidance is found in the following excerpt from Master Barber’s decision in Tieu v. [read post]
24 May 2008, 11:31 pm
X------------------------------------------------------- I know I know plaintiff lawyers... you've read or heard about Macomber v Travelers and/or Spencer v Hartford and been fed the facts and the propaganda- you're thinking "how can I trust these people? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:35 pm by Steve Kalar
Shortly after she went to the Supreme Court the second time on the good time issue in Barber v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
Jordan-Barber was sent to prison in January after pleading guilty to conspiring to commit misconduct in public office. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm by Anna Christensen
  Carl Cecere of Akin Gump has previewed Tuesday’s upcoming argument in Barber v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:41 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Barber alegaba que habían sido víctimas de un ataque en el que ambos habían sufrido disparos, sobreviviendo solamente él. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 7:04 am by Just Security
Eisen (@NormEisen), Joshua Kolb (@JoshuaGKolb) and Andrew Warren Affirmative Action and International Law Racial Justice Without Affirmative Action: Embracing International Law after SFFA v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:59 am
" "It's killed me on production," said David Barber, owner of Barber's Seafood in Eastpoint. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, his application for disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c was denied, which administrative determination was affirmed by the Appellate Division [see Matter of Jackson v Barber, 133 AD3d 958].In August 2013, Jacksonsubmitted a physician's note stating that, as a result of his foot condition, he was restricted from working more than 40 hours and 35 minutes per week. [read post]