Search for: "Barry Friedman" Results 261 - 280 of 378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by Gerard Magliocca
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803); Barry Friedman, The Will of the People:  How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution 62-63 (2009) (giving the conventional view of Marbury); Mark Tushnet, Constitutional Hardball, 37 J. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Ed Kalikow, President & CEO, The Kalikow Group Barry Rudofsky, Principal, Bronstein Properties David Unger, Chief Operating Officer, US Energy Group James Wacht, President, Sierra Realty Corp. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 12:59 pm by Lawrence Solum
Check out Paul Horwitz's post entitled Reversing by Degrees, which recommends and critiques Barry Friedman's The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:18 pm by Paul Horwitz
Arizona), a fine new piece by Professor Barry Friedman of New York University School of Law. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:50 am by Paul Horwitz
Barry Friedman, The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:50 am
And online at SSRN, law professor Barry Friedman has an article titled "The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda V. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
Barry Friedman (New York University School of Law) has posted The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Barry Friedman (New York University School of Law) has posted Reply: The Will of the People and the Process of Constitutional Change (George Washington Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
 Barry Friedman, Ted Ruger, Lori Ringhand, and others (including, from time to time, myself) have tried to integrate the political science findings with legal analysis, but most of us when not specifically engaged in that effort--and the vast majority of scholars who write about the work of the Supreme Court from within legal academia--continue to write and to teach as though doctrine and interpretive methodology matter a good deal more than they do. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:48 am by Adam Shinar
(Barry Friedman has for years claimed that there is no counter-majoritarian difficulty because the Court reflects the majority). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am by Gerard Magliocca
I thought I’d put up an abstract of this new draft that I’m putting together. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:02 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The late, great progenitors of the conservative movement - folks like Ayn Rand, Bill Buckley, Barry Goldwater, Milton Friedman - all held views that today would have them either hounded out of the GOP by social conservatives, or at best tolerated and ignored as eccentric RINOs.I've become incredibly cynical about the terms "liberal" and "conservative," which as I said to Burka have lost all connection to any historical meaning. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:05 am by Larry Ribstein
Barry Friedman noted that the decision’s timing was “inauspicious as a public relations move,” coming just as “the public generally is up in arms about financial matters, corporations, money in politics, and the like. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:42 am by David Lat
The panel was being videotaped, so before the start of the event, the speakers met in the office of the panel organizer, Professor Barry Friedman, to sign release forms. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  For info, contact Yacine Barry, CLE Coordinator:  NYWBA, 132 East 43rd St., The Chrysler Bldg, #716, New York, NY 10017-4019 (CLE@nywba.org or 212-490 8202). [read post]
28 May 2010, 6:41 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: There is much to admire about Barry Friedman’s new book, The Will of the People. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:53 pm by Ann Althouse
Barry Friedman answers — in the SCOTUSblog live-chat — “gosh, the justices *are* living in the world with us; they read the papers, watch the news, go to cocktail parties. chief justice rehnquist discussed this in print. the people don’t have to speak directly to them – as president obama did at the state of the union – the constitutional conversation just goes on around them. [read post]