Search for: "Baxter v. Baxter" Results 261 - 280 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 8:23 am by Michelle Yeary
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, 2011 U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:35 am by Bexis
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 2011 WL 4007675 (S.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The federal court also cited to [*2]cases where the proposed expert was precluded from testifying on the causation issue since his theory that silicone implants could cause undifferentiated connective tissue diseases was not based on scientifically valid methodologies and has not been accepted in the scientific community (see Havard v Baxter Intl. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
" The piece was very critical of trial lawyers in America for lobbying Congress to pass the "Medical Safety Device Act," which would overturn the U.S Supreme Court's decision in Riegel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:36 pm by Andrew A. Lundgren
The Court construed five terms and phrases in the underlying ANDA litigation: "A volatile liquid anaesthetic" "A tubular outlet through which said volatile liquid anaesthetic agent can leave said reservoir and vapor can enter said reservoir when said valve is open" "Free end" "Perimeter" "Means for forming a connection between said container and a vaporizer to retain said container on the vaporizer, said means comprising a formation formed on the outer… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
And before that, we had retirements by Justices Werdegar, Baxter, Kennard, Moreno and George -- all within the past decade or so, and all of whom (I believe) remain alive and kicking to this very day.Try to get a similar list of United States Supreme Court justices who've left, particularly in the current political era. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
Procedure: Prior art in Inter Partes Review: Baxter Corporation Englewood v. [read post]