Search for: "Bennett v. Attorney General"
Results 261 - 280
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
RAYMOND ROWE, POLLY RUMBOUGH, and FIVE-STAR REALTY, INC., Appellees. 2nd District.Attorney's fees -- Contracts -- Contingency fee agreement -- Termination of services clause -- Representation agreement between attorney and client was unenforceable as matter of law where provision of agreement providing for immediate payment of accrued hourly rates upon discharge constituted a penalty clause, in violation of Bar rule -- Argument that trial court should have severed offending language… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:39 am
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
The Bennett daughters at the center of the story must marry because if they do not, their odious cousin Mr. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Bennett. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:53 am
Unless you believe the 7th Circuit's condemnation of Walter Maksym in Stanard v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:42 am
If criminal defendants generally have no good lobby, impoverished criminal defendants fare even worse. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW) New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology) Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Class 46) District Court of The Hague: Legal costs: Vetus v Inno Nautic (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague awards claim for ‘rest damage’: ABK Kunststoffen v Snoeks Automotive B.V (EPLAW) New Zealand NZ High Court clears patent attorneys of negligence: The Baby Hammock Co Limited v AJ Park Law (Patentology) Northern Ireland Ploughing a lonely furrow? [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
Attorneys are [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
Attorneys are [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
Attorneys are [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:41 am
The Privy Council grappled with this question in Warren v Attorney General of Jersey [2011] UKPC 10, an abuse of process case in which the facts were similar to those in Maxwell. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm
[Defendant] Mark Bennett took the opportunity to review [what is in some circles speculated to be] Joseph Rakofsky's Craigslist Ad to Replace his attorney, and to offer helpful suggestions toward its revision. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm
[Defendant] Mark Bennett took the opportunity to review [what is in some circles speculated to be] Joseph Rakofsky's Craigslist Ad to Replace his attorney, and to offer helpful suggestions toward its revision. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm
[Defendant] Mark Bennett took the opportunity to review [what is in some circles speculated to be] Joseph Rakofsky's Craigslist Ad to Replace his attorney, and to offer helpful suggestions toward its revision. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:43 am
The Appellate Division held that inasmuch as petitioner has no biological relationship to the children, his standing to seek custody was determined under the common-law standard requiring the establishment of extraordinary factual circumstances (see Matter of Bennett v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Bennett v The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, the plaintiff alleged that Northwestern Life in denying the plaintiff's claims for disability benefits was in violation of the above mentioned laws and breached the terms of the disability insurance policy. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
(Generally, corporations and similar business entities are not permitted to appear pro se/in propria persona, and must be represented by an attorney. [read post]
