Search for: "Bird v Bird"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
” Judiciary Law § 487 does not require a showing of detrimental reliance (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]). [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
A blaze of recent publicity, and a great deal of legal maneuvering, has turned on the issue of the conservatorship of Britney Spears. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:12 am
[/Update]The two law firms that represented Nokia in the German parts of its recently-settled disputes, Arnold & Ruess (Nokia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:09 pm
Cal. 1987)); but see Prewitt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 3:52 pm
In Texas, they shoot them down like game birds. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 10:36 am
Bird has died. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows &… [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:19 am
FTC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Lim v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am
v=RvV3nn_de2k Since 2001, LawLawLawTM has documented trends in technology, law (mostly patents and trademarks), baseball (mostly Red Sox), and music (mostly rock). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:27 am
See McBride v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am
Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:45 pm
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Guam v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Here's Lillian: FROM THE EMAIL: Wild Swan writes:I know why the caged bird sang and why they cheered. [read post]