Search for: "Black v. Social Security Administration" Results 261 - 280 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
O’Donnell, a Social Security pensioner, had “habitability defenses. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am by Ray Dowd
For example, the legislative history for the 1976 Copyright Act states that “‘choreographic works’ do not include social dance steps and simple routines. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
But French law does provide for the Louvre's actions: last December last, France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d’État, confirmed that a public entity can forbid a private entity to take pictures of works inside a public museum. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
"[15] The story refers to the recent decision of Green Mountain Chrysler Plymouth Dodge Jeep v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Arizona: UCP of Central Arizona 1802 West Parkside Lane Phoenix, AZ 85027 Phone: (602) 943-5472; (888) 943-5472 (Toll Free) Fax: (602) 943-4936 E-mail: info@ucpofaz.org Web: http://www.ucpofaz.com UCP of Southern Arizona 3941 East 29th Street, Suite 601-604 Tucson, AZ 85711 Phone: (520) 795-3108 Fax: (520) 795-3196 E-mail: staff@ucpsa.org Web: http://www.ucpsa.org ARIZONA STATE RESOURCES AGING Arizona Association of Homes and Housing for the Aging… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Furthermore, that process fails as a means of providing effective or legitimate legal review of administrative action. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
At issue are nonprofit “social welfare” groups registered under the 501(c)(4) section of the tax code. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Black Lives Matter Louisville leader Chanelle Helm is heard on the video mocking McConnell’s recent shoulder injury and saying he “should have broken his little, raggedy, wrinkled-ass neck. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]