Search for: "Board of Directors v. Superior Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
Moreover, she did not meaningfully contest that the problems identified by the director in her investigation might have led the superior to at least suspect that the nurse was engaged in drug diversion. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:29 pm
” This clear-and-convincing-evidence standard, the court held in today’s Davis v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:29 am
A recent Superior Court case illustrates that some directors don’t understand it at all, or don’t care. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:05 pm
Nick sought to overturn the city’s decision by seeking a writ of administrative mandamus, but the superior court denied Nick’s writ petition and the Appeals court affirmed that decision in Nick v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Fee enhancement request for exceptional delay; passage of time and superior work product found not so exceptional in itself as to warrant a fee enhancement The Complainants’ also sought an across-the-board 20% fee enhancement under Perdue v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
. . .In conjunction with their enthusiasm for Bitcoin, [Morici] and Defendants were participants in an internet message board known as Bitcoin Talk. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded general damages of Can$30,000 to the individual plaintiff in respect of five postings on a bulletin board which were accessed 742 times. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
Canada On 23 February 2015, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the long running “blogger libel” case of Baglow v Smith 2015 ONSC 1175. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:38 pm
C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:16 am
C&J Energy Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:37 pm
In Kahn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm
The Court found that the board’s decision to sell at $1.75 per share pled a claim for breach of the directors’ duty of care obligations. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Matúz contacted the television company’s president and sent a letter to its board, informing them that the cultural director’s conduct in modifying and cutting certain contents of Éjjeli menedék amounted to censorship. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:34 am
Executive Perspectives, Superior Court, Waterbury, Docket No. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 7:34 am
Executive Perspectives, Superior Court, Waterbury, Docket No. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
