Search for: "Board v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 27,938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:46 pm by Patent Docs
IAM North America editor Richard Lloyd will moderate a roundtable discussion of attorneys from Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt; Knobbe Martens; and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in decisions in Oil States v Greene's Energy and SAS Institute v Iancu and how they will affect the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), inter partes review petitioners, and patent owners. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm by Elizabeth McElvein
The state Supreme Court held in Attorney General v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:24 am by Thomas Long
The Board relied on improper evidence to support its key findings and did not cite to other substantial evidence to support its findings, the Federal Circuit held (Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am by MBettman
On May 19, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Board of Health of Cuyahoga County v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:29 am by Rose Hughes
(T 0758/20)BREAKING: In-person proceedings are still the "Gold Standard" - Boards of Appeal start to diverge on ViCo (T 2432/19)Keeping a digital poker face: Assessing witness credibility in the ViCo age (T 423/22)Boards of Appeal confirm lack of legal basis for mandatory ViCo proceedings absent a state of general emergency (T 0149/21)A referral to the Enlarged Board on prior use (G 1/23)The round up last year ended with this Kat's less than… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
The secretary of state has stated she will appeal the decision. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:01 pm
The 9th held that a district court abused its discretion by enjoining the Washington State Board of Pharmacy from enforcing its... [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Tyler
Wilner (retired, specially assigned).From the official headnote:Reaffirming the Yorkdale Corporation v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]